What is necessary when executing a project without a valid Contract/Statement of Work (SoW)?

Executing a project without a valid Contract or Statement of Work (SoW) often puts the project at risk due to the lack of formal agreement or guidelines. In a situation where the project must proceed despite the absence of a contract or SoW, the idea of working ahead emphasizes the need to continue making progress in order to meet potentially critical deadlines or deliverables. This approach can be seen as a practical response to maintain momentum even when formal agreements are lacking.

In environments where contracts serve as critical frameworks for scope, responsibilities, and boundaries, working ahead is generally fraught with challenges and uncertainty. However, the necessity to move forward can arise from circumstances that require urgent action, which makes the need to work proactively a viable response.

The other options do not directly address the need to progress with the project. Concessions often involve negotiating terms or adjustments but may not suffice in providing the necessary groundwork for moving forward. Seeking the permission of an organizational unit head can be part of governance or oversight but does not inherently facilitate the continuation of the project. Therefore, emphasizing the act of working ahead aligns with the need to ensure that project timelines are honored, even when formal structures are missing.